Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Owano v Jera

Owano v Jera (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E005 of 2023) [2023] KEELC 20727 (KLR) (17 October 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEELC 20727 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT HOMA BAY ENVIRONMENT AND LAND MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION E005 OF 2023 GMA ONGONDO, J OCTOBER 17, 2023 BETWEEN DANIS OKUMU OWANO ...................................................................... APPLICANT AND NATHANIEL OYUGI JERA ............................................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. By a Notice of Motion application dated August 8, 2023, the applicant, Danis Okumu Owano in person sought, inter alia, he be granted leave to appeal out of time. 2. The respondent, Nathaniel Oyugi Jera has not responded to the application. 3. Ms. Odera learned counsel for the respondent has informed this court that the respondent does not oppose the application. 4. The applicant has stated that he can le an appeal within thirty days from this date. 5. In the circumstances, the application has merit. 6. Wherefore, the application is hereby allowed with costs to abide the outcome of the prospective appeal. 7. The applicant to lodge and serve appeal within thirty days from this date failure of which these orders shall lapse automatically without any further orders of this court being necessary. 8. It is so ordered. DELIVERED AND DATED AT HOMABAY THIS 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 G.M.A ONG’ONDO JUDGE Present https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/20727/eng@2023-10-17 1

page 1 of 2

Applicant in person Ms Aluoch Odera learned counsel for respondent. Court Assistant, Luanga Terence and Fiona https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/20727/eng@2023-10-17 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.