Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Odede & 3 others v Arunga & 3 others

Odede & 3 others v Arunga & 3 others (Constitutional Petition 12 of 2021) [2023] KEELC 21449 (KLR) (18 October 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEELC 21449 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT HOMA BAY CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION 12 OF 2021 GMA ONGONDO, J OCTOBER 18, 2023 BETWEEN ISAAC MAURICE KIBUYE MUSA ODEDE ................................. 1ST PETITIONER BEATRICE ATIENO OCHIENG ................................................... 2ND PETITIONER ISAIAH AGWENGE ODERA ......................................................... 3RD PETITIONER AND LILIAN ACHIENG ODIWUOR ............................................................. APPLICANT AND ROBERT ARUNGA ....................................................................... 1ST RESPONDENT GEORGE KIDENDA ..................................................................... 2ND RESPONDENT THE LANDS REGISTRAR RACHUONYO DISTRICT .......... 3RD RESPONDENT THE HONOURABLE ATTORNEY GENERAL ........................ 4TH RESPONDENT RULING 1. 2. This ruling is in regard to an application by way of Notice of Motion dated 13th April 2023 and led on by the applicant, Lillian Achieng Odiwuor through O.P Ngoge and Associates Advocates. She is seeking the following orders: a. That Lilian Achieng Odiwuor be enjoined in this matter as the 1st Petitioner in place of Isaac Maurice Kibuye Odede (Deceased). b. That the Costs of this Application be in the Cause. The application is premised upon the applicant’s supporting adavit of four paragraphs sworn on even date and the annexed copy of grant “LAO1” as well as the ground set out on the face of the application. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/21449/eng@2023-10-18 1

page 1 of 2

The applicant states that the 1st Petitioner is deceased. That she be allowed to join this suit in lieu of the deceased. 3. There is no response to the application. 4. Ms Agade instructed by the rm of Odondi Awino and Company Advocates for the 1st and 2nd respondents, has no objection to the application. 5. So, Mr. O.P Ngoge learned counsel for the applicant has implored this court to grant the orders sought in the application. 6. In the premises, I nd the application cogent, steadfast and merited. 7. The upshot is that the application is hereby allowed in terms of order 1 sought therein and as stated in paragraph 1(a) hereinabove. 8. Costs of the application be in the cause. 9. It so ordered. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT HOMABAY THIS 18TH DAY OCTOBER, 2023. G.M.A ONG’ONDO JUDGE PRESENT. 1. Mr. O.P Ngoge learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Ms Agade instructed by Odondi Awino for the 1st and 2nd respondents. 3. Court Assistants, Luanga and Mutiva. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/21449/eng@2023-10-18 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.