Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Otieno (Suing as administrator of the Estate of the Late Meshack Otieno Ariya - Deceased) v Yoya; Onyango (Applicant) (Suing as the administrator of the Estate of Walter Onyango - Deceased) (Environment & Land Case 29 of 2021) [2024] KEELC 168 (KLR)

Otieno (Suing as administrator of the Estate of the Late Meshack Otieno Ariya - Deceased) v Yoya; Onyango (Applicant) (Suing as the administrator of the Estate of Walter Onyango - Deceased) (Environment & Land Case 29 of 2021) [2024] KEELC 168 (KLR) (22 January 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 168 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT HOMA BAY ENVIRONMENT & LAND CASE 29 OF 2021 GMA ONGONDO, J JANUARY 22, 2024 BETWEEN MESHACK TAMBO OTIENO .................................................................. PLAINTIFF SUING AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE MESHACK OTIENO ARIYA - DECEASED AND WALTER ONYANGO YOYA ................................................................. DEFENDANT AND ERICK GEORGE OMONDI ONYANGO .............................................. APPLICANT SUING AS THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF WALTER ONYANGO - DECEASED RULING 1. 2. By a Notice of Motion dated 14th November 2023, the applicant through M/S Ochwangi & Company Advocates has sought the orders infra; a. The Honourable court be pleased to grant leave and/or liberty to the applicant herein to be substituted as the defendant herein in lieu of Walter Onyango Yoya (now deceased) b. Consequent to prayer (20 herein above being granted, the applicant be deemed as the defendant, suing for and on behalf of the estate of the deceased person herein. c. Costs of the application do abide the cause. Ms. Nyaenya instructed by Mr. Ochwangi learned counsel for the respondent has informed the court that the application is unopposed. Thus, she has implored the court to allow the same. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/168/eng@2024-01-22 1

page 1 of 2

3. Ms Aluoch Odera learned counsel for the plaintifi/respondent has no objection to the application. 4. In circumstances, I find the application unopposed and merited. 5. A fortiori, the application is allowed in terms of orders (a) (b) and (c) as stated in paragraph 1 thereinabove. 6. Cost of the application be in the cause. 7. It is so ordered. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT HOMA BAY THIS 22ND JANUARY 2024 G. M.A ONGONDO JUDGE PRESENT 1. Ms. Aluoch Odera, learned counsel for the plaintifi 2. Ms. Nyaenya instructed by Mr. Ochwangi, learned counsel for the applicant 3. Luanga, Court Assistant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/168/eng@2024-01-22 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.