Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Orero & 5 others v Ombewa (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons 02 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 5103 (KLR)

Orero & 5 others v Ombewa (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons 02 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 5103 (KLR) (12 June 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEELC 5103 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MIGORI ENVIROMENTAL AND LAND ORIGINATING SUMMONS 02 OF 2024 FO NYAGAKA, J JUNE 12, 2025 BETWEEN PIUS AKUMU ORERO ........................................................................ 1ST PLAINTIFF PHILIP OSEWE ORERO .................................................................... 2ND PLAINTIFF LUKE OUMA ORERO ........................................................................ 3RD PLAINTIFF BENARD ONYANGO ORERO .......................................................... 4TH PLAINTIFF PATRICK OTIEN AKUMU ................................................................ 5TH PLAINTIFF NICANOR OWUOR AKUMU .......................................................... 6TH PLAINTIFF AND JOSEPH AYO OMBEWA ........................................................................ DEFENDANT RULING 1. What is pending before this court is a Notice to Show Cause why this suit should not be dismissed which Notice is dated 03/02/2025. The Plaintifis instituted this suit vide Originating Summons on 15/01/2024 and as the matter proceeded, the Defendants obtained orders for maintenance of status quo vide a ruling delivered on 18/07/2024. When the matter came up on 31/01/2025, the Notice to Show Cause was issued. 2. The 1st Plaintifi filed an Afidavit dated 03/03/2025 to Show Cause why this suit should not be dismissed. He deposed that the provisions of law on which the Notice to Show Cause is anchored does not provide for dismissal of a suit for want of prosecution. Further, that the matter has been actively prosecuted and the court gave directions on 12/11/2024 to the parties to file submissions on the Preliminary Objection. He stated that the matter was fixed for mention to confirm filing of submissions on 30/01/2025 when his advocate failed to attend due to inadvertence and failure to https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/5103/eng@2025-06-12 1

page 1 of 2

diarize the date. He cited the provisions of Order 17, Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules and urged the court find that the matter should not be dismissed. Analysis & Disposition 3. The power to dismiss a suit for want of prosecution is governed Order 17 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Order 17 Rule 2(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules provides as follows: “ In any suit in which no application has been made or step taken by either party for one year, the court may give notice in writing to the parties to show cause why the suit should not be dismissed, and if cause is not shown to its satisfaction, may dismiss the suit.” 4. The court issued a ruling on the Defendants’ Notice of Motion on 18/07/2024. That was the last time the suit was active before the court fixed the matter for the Notice to Show Cause. The matter then came up for directions on 12/11/2024 when the court gave directions on the Preliminary Objection dated 25/01/2024 which was then set for further directions on 30/01/2025. The Respondents thereafter withdrew the Preliminary Objection and the Plaintifi was given ten days to show cause as to why the matter should not be dismissed. The Plaintifi has explained in detail through the Afidavit Showing Cause why the matter should not be dismissed. Indeed, from the facts deposed they did their best in the circumstances. 5. I am satisfied that this suit is not ripe for dismissal just yet and as such the Plaintifis have shown suficient cause as to why it should not be dismissed. 6. The Plaintifi is directed to expedite the hearing of the suit since the Preliminary Objection was withdrawn and the matter can now proceed to for hearing and to its logical conclusion. The parties are directed to file their trial bundles within the next 30 days and exchange them, in default the matter will be mentioned again, on 18th July 2025 for dismissal for want of compliance. Mention on 18th July 2025. 7. Orders accordingly. RULING DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIA THE TEAMS PLATFORM THIS 12TH DAY OF JUNE 2025. HON. DR. IUR FRED NYAGAKA, JUDGE. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/5103/eng@2025-06-12 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.