Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Kibitok & 3 others v Rotich & 4 others (Environment and Land Case E014 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 8023 (KLR)

Kibitok & 3 others v Rotich & 4 others (Environment and Land Case E014 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 8023 (KLR) (18 November 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEELC 8023 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT KAPSABET ENVIRONMENT AND LAND CASE E014 OF 2023 GMA ONGONDO, J NOVEMBER 18, 2025 BETWEEN GIDION KIBITOK ............................................................................... 1ST PLAINTIFF BENARD KIPKORIR ......................................................................... 2ND PLAINTIFF STEPHEN KIPLAGAT ........................................................................ 3RD PLAINTIFF DENNIS KIPLAGAT ........................................................................... 4TH PLAINTIFF AND ANNAH JEPSAT ROTICH ............................................................. 1ST DEFENDANT JONATHAN KIBIWOT MUREI .................................................... 2ND DEFENDANT COUNTY LAND REGISTRATION NANDI ............................... 3RD DEFENDANT ATTORNEY GENERAL .................................................................. 4TH DEFENDANT NATIONAL LAND COMMISSION .............................................. 5TH DEFENDANT RULING 1. By a Notice of motion dated 6th November 2025, the 1st and 2nd Defendants/Applicants through Rotich, Langat Partners Advocates are seeking the orders which include; maintenance of status quo on the register of the suit land reference number Nandi/cheptil/49 pending the hearing of the main suit. 2. In the replying afidavit sworn on 12th November 2025 by the 3rd Respondent/Plaintifi for his own behalf and on behalf of his co-Respondents, the application is opposed to the efiect that the application is a non-starter for reasons, inter alia, that there was fraud in registration of the suit land. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/8023/eng@2025-11-18 1

page 1 of 2

3. By the supplementary afidavit sworn on 14th November 2025 by the 2nd Applicant/Defendant for his own behalf and on behalf of his co-Respondents, the alleged fraud in the replying afidavit is denied and that the same together with other issues to await the decision of the Court. 4. Mr Rotich has implored the Court to protect the suit land by an interim preservation order that registration of the suit land should not be altered until this matter is resolved. That therefore, the application be compromised thereby. 5. Ms Isiaho learned counsel for the Respondents did not oppose the application. She referred to paragraph 10 of the Replying Afidavit that the registration be maintained pending the hearing and determination of this matter on merit. 6. Ms I. Khaoya learned Counsel for the 5th Defendant and Ms Cheruiyot learned Counsel for the 3rd and 4th Defendants have no objection to the request by Applicants’ counsel. 7. In that regard, is the status quo order sought by the Applicants’ Counsel merited? 8. It is common ground that the registration of the suit land should not be altered pending the outcome of this suit. 9. This Court is mandated under Section 13 (7) of the Environment and Court Act 2015 (2011) to grant interim preservation orders inclusive of status quo sought by the applicants in the application. 10. It is established law that the Court can grant status quo orders over the subject matter in dispute until the suit is determined or terminated; see Ogada -vs- Mollin (2009) KLR 620. 11. In the result, the application dated 6th November 2025 is hereby compromised by Counsel for the respective parties thus; 12. a. The current registration of the suit land shall remain and not be altered pending the outcome of this suit. b. No orders as to costs. It is so ordered. DATED AND DELIVERED AT KAPSABET THIS 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025. HON. G M A ONGONDO JUDGE In the presence of; Ms Isiaho Learned Counsel for the Respondents/Plaintifis Mr M Rotich Learned Counsel for the Applicants/1st and 2nd Defendants Ms I. Khaoya Learned Counsel for the 5th Defendant Ms Cheruiyot Learned Counsel for the 3rd and 4th Defendants Walter, Court Assistant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/8023/eng@2025-11-18 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.