Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Munene & another v Matiri & another (Environment and Land Case 106 of 2009) [2026] KEELC 516 (KLR)

Munene & another v Matiri & another (Environment and Land Case 106 of 2009) [2026] KEELC 516 (KLR) (2 February 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEELC 516 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MERU ENVIRONMENT AND LAND CASE 106 OF 2009 BM EBOSO, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026 BETWEEN KENNETH KIREMA MUNENE ........................................................ 1ST PLAINTIFF MARTIN KIREMA MUNENE ........................................................... 2ND PLAINTIFF AND HARRIET NTAKIRA MATIRI ...................................................... 1ST DEFENDANT BENJAMIN NKANDO MUNENE ................................................ 2ND DEFENDANT RULING 1. Prayers 1 and 2 of the application dated 7/7/2025 were granted in the preceding court sessions and are now spent. What is outstanding is prayer 3 which is a plea for an order of stay of execution. 2. The applicant has decided to withdraw the said outstanding limb of the application. There is no objection to the oral plea to withdraw the outstanding limb of the application. 3. In the circumstances, the oral plea is allowed and the application dated 7/7/2025 is marked “spent with no order as to costs”. The file shall be marked “case closed”. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026. B M EBOSO [MR] ELC JUDGE In the presence of: Ms Mutema for the 2nd Defendant Mr Kaume holding brief for Mr Kimathi for the Plaintifis. Mr John Muthomi for the 1st Defendant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/516/eng@2026-02-02 1

page 1 of 2

Court Assistant – Mr. E. Tupet https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/516/eng@2026-02-02 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.