Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Kalama (Suing as the legal administrator of the Estate of Katana Kalama Jefwa) v Sheti & 2 others (Land Case E129 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 643 (KLR)

Kalama (Suing as the legal administrator of the Estate of Katana Kalama Jefwa) v Sheti & 2 others (Land Case E129 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 643 (KLR) (4 February 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEELC 643 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MALINDI LAND CASE E129 OF 2025 FM NJOROGE, J FEBRUARY 4, 2026 BETWEEN KITSAO JEFWA KALAMA (SUING AS THE LEGAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF KATANA KALAMA JEFWA) ..................................... PLAINTIFF AND JAPHET KARISA SHETI & 2 OTHERS & 2 OTHERS & 2 OTHERS ................................................................................................... DEFENDANT RULING 1. Kitsao Jefwa Kalama as the legal administrator of the estate of Katana Kalama Jefwa sued the 3 defendants in this suit vide plaint dated 12th September 2025 in which he sought inter alia a declaration that the estate of the late Katana Kalama Jefwa is the lawful allotee and rightful owner of land parcel Kilifi/Kibarani/516 (hereinafter referred to as “the suit land”. Filed with the plaint was an application under certificate of agency of the same date seeking a temporary injunction restraining the 1st respondent or any person claiming under him from in any way whatsoever interfering with the suit land. 2. The application is supported by the plaintifis’ sworn afidavit in which he exhibits a copy of the grant of letters of administration to the deceased estate. he states that vide a letter of ofier dated 29th December 1995 the deceased was allocated Plot Number 516 Kilifi Kibarani Settlement Scheme measuring approximately 1.1 Hectares by the Ministry of Lands and Settlement; he exhibits a copy of the letter of ofier in his afidavit. He avers that the deceased made full payments at the Settlement Ofice, Kilifi and took possession of the land and erected a house thereon. He also planted coconut trees thereon. Copies of receipts and photographs of the developments on the suit land are exhibited as “Exh. KJK3”. The deceased passed away in 2020 before issuance of a title deed in respect of the suit land. Upon being appointed administrator, the plaintifi visited the lands ofice to finalize processing of title only to discover that the 1st defendant had procured the title deed to the suit property on 11th March https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/643/eng@2026-02-04 1

page 1 of 2

2016; that the 1st defendant, armed with the title deed to the suit land, has already began asserting ownership of the same and the plaintifi is apprehensive that the 1st defendant may at any time evict the deceased’s family or the destroy the only developments left behind by the deceased. It is stated that there is a permanent residential house and perennial crops on the suit land which are at risk of destruction and that the estate would sufier irreparable was unless the orders sought are granted. 3. I have upon perusal of the CTS and the physical file found that there is no response to the application; it is therefore unopposed and I granted in terms of prayer number 2 thereof. The costs of the application shall be in the cause. 4. The parties hearing shall ensure compliance with Order 11 Of The Civil Procedure Rules, the plaintifi within 30 days from today and the defendant within 30 days from the date of expiry of the period granted to the plaintifi, and the matter shall be mentioned on 14th April 2026 for pretrial. It is so ordered. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MALINDI ON THIS 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026. MWANGI NJOROGE, JUDGE, ELC, MALINDI. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/643/eng@2026-02-04 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.