Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Magiri v M’Ikulu (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E011 of 2023) [2026] KEELC 3733 (KLR)

Magiri v M’Ikulu (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E011 of 2023) [2026] KEELC 3733 (KLR) (10 June 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEELC 3733 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MERU ENVIROMENTAL AND LAND ORIGINATING SUMMONS E011 OF 2023 BM EBOSO, J JUNE 10, 2026 BETWEEN JACOB RAIBU MAGIRI ........................................................................... PLAINTIFF AND M’RUKUNGU M’IKULU ...................................................................... DEFENDANT RULING [EX-TEMPORE] 1. The plaintifi brought a notice of motion date 18/6/2025 seeking an order lifting the order of inhibition registered against land parcel number Kianjai/Thau/525. When the applicant came up for hearing on 2/6/2026, Mr Wamache who held Mr Kimathi’s brief for the plaintifi insisted that the plaintifi would argue the application notwithstanding the fact that the Court of Appeal had issued a status-quo order afiecting the relevant land register. 2. Today, the plaintifi’s counsel has orally applied to withdraw the application. The defendant does not oppose the oral plea but insists on being awarded costs of the application. The defendant has pointed out that he had filed a response to the application. 3. Taking all the above into account, the oral plea to withdraw the application will be and is hereby allowed. The applicant shall bear costs of the application dated 18/6/2025 which is now marked “withdrawn”. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026. B M EBOSO [MR] ELC JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/3733/eng@2026-06-10 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.