Kenya Building, Construction, Timber, Furniture & Allied Industries Employees’ Union v Mareba Eldoret Ltd (Cause 20 of 2003) [2004] KEIC 2 (KLR)

19. Ephraim Alugaya 20. Gerald Akonya 21. Wellington Odera 22. Samwel Mulera 23. Ronald Wanjala 24. Michael Likwilu 25. Boniface Muhati 26. Ben V. Ochieng 27. Fred Musamali 28. Peter Asibiko 29. Simon Mulinge 30. Sammy Mwangi 31. Mary Nthiga 32. Frank Oduba 33. Patrick Oduory 34. Samson Nandi 35. Joshua Yimbebi 36. Anne Marabu 37. Mary Kinuthia 38. Bernard Sidori 39. Enos Mwangale 40. Issack Mwaura 41. Kennedy Manda 42. Alfred Lubanga 43. Peter Kibira 44. Joseph Lubanga 45. David Ochieng 1. On 7th April, 2003, the Minister for Labour referred this dispute to the Court for consideration and determination in accordance with the powers vested in him by Section 8 of the Trade Disputes Act, Cap.234, Laws of Kenya, (which is hereinafter referred to as the Act); and his reference, together with the statutory certificates from the Labour Commissioner and the Minister himself under Section 14(9) (e) and (f) of the Act, were received by the Court on 8th April, 2003. The dispute was then listed for mention on 24th April, 2003, and the parties were notified to attend. Mr. Gikunju for the Union attended but there was no appearance for the Company. In spite of the latter’s absence, however, the parties were directed to submit or file their respective written memoranda or statements by 26th May and 26th June, 2003, respectively, and the dispute was fixed for hearing on 15th July, 2003. The parties were again notified to comply and attend. Mr. Gikunju submitted his memorandum on 29th May, 2003, but the Company neither filed its reply statement as directed nor attended. On 15th July, 2003, only Mr. Gikunju attended; and under the circumstances, the dispute was rescheduled for hearing on 29th October, 2003, and the Company was granted another opportunity to file its reply statement by 15th August, 2003. But it did not do so. On 29th October, 2003, Mr. J.A. Wananda, who appeared for the Company, applied for adjournment of the matter to enable the parties explore the possibility of an amicable settlement out of Court. Mr. Gikunju for the Union did not object to the application for adjournment, and the case was stood over generally. 2. Consequently, the parties presented or filed the following memorandum of settlement, dated 19th December, 2003, duly signed by Messrs. Wananda and Gikunju for the parties:By consent, (a) The amount now due has been agreed at Kshs.4,455,251.40. (b) The said amount be settled in twenty-nine (29) instalments of Kshs.150,000/ = each and one of Kshs.105,251.40, commencing the first day of December https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keic/2004/2/eng@2004-02-19 2

page 2 of 3

2003 and thereafter on the first day of each succeeding month until payment in full.” 3. In my humble consideration, the terms of the amicable settlement are fair and reasonable, and I enter an award by consent as above. DATED AND GIVEN IN NAIROBI THIS 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2004. CHARLES P. CHEMMUTTUT, JUDGE. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keic/2004/2/eng@2004-02-19 3

page 3 of 3